Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four
Smoke rises in the sky at the site of a Russian drone strike in Odesa, Ukraine on March 11, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 12 March 2025
Follow

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four

Kyiv: Russian strike on Ukraine’s Odesa port kills four
  • Attack late Tuesday came as Ukraine endorsed an American proposal for a 30-day ceasefire

KYIV: A Russian ballistic missile strike overnight on the southern Ukrainian port city of Odesa killed four people and damaged a Barbados-flagged cargo ship, Ukrainian authorities said Wednesday.
The attack late Tuesday came as Ukraine endorsed an American proposal for a 30-day ceasefire and agreed to immediate negotiations with Russia.
Ukrainian officials said the attack occurred as the cargo ship was being loaded with a grain consignment intended to be sent to Algeria.
“Unfortunately, four people died – citizens of Syria. The youngest victim was 18, the oldest was 24 years old. Two more people were wounded – a Ukrainian and a Syrian,” Oleksiy Kuleba, vice prime minister for reconstruction wrote on social media.
“Russia is attacking Ukraine’s infrastructure, including ports that are involved in ensuring the world’s food security,” he added.
Separately, the governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region said a 47-year-old woman was killed during a Russian missile attack on the central city of Kryvyi Rig, the hometown of President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The Ukrainian air force said that in total Russia had launched three missiles at the war-battered country overnight as well as 133 drones of various types, including the Iranian-designed Shahed-type attack drone.
Its air defense units shot down 98 of the drones, the air force added.


Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect

Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect
Updated 20 sec ago
Follow

Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect

Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect
  • Trump’s use of tariffs to extract concessions from other nations points toward a possibly destructive trade war
  • It also has destabilized the stock market and stoked anxiety about an economic downturn

Trump’s use of tariffs to extract concessions from other nations points toward a possibly destructive trade war

It also has destabilized the stock market and stoked anxiety about an economic downturn

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump openly challenged US allies on Wednesday by increasing tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to 25 percent as he vowed to take back wealth “stolen” by other countries, drawing quick retaliation from Europe and Canada.
The Republican president’s use of tariffs to extract concessions from other nations points toward a possibly destructive trade war and a stark change in America’s approach to global leadership. It also has destabilized the stock market and stoked anxiety about an economic downturn.
“The United States of America is going to take back a lot of what was stolen from it by other countries and, frankly, by incompetent US leadership,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday. “We’re going to take back our wealth, and we’re going to take back a lot of the companies that left.”
Trump removed all exemptions from his 2018 tariffs on the metals, in addition to increasing the tariffs on aluminum from 10 percent. His moves, based off a February directive, are part of a broader effort to disrupt and transform global commerce.
He has separate tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, with plans to also tax imports from the European Union, Brazil and South Korea by charging “reciprocal” rates starting on April 2.
The EU announced its own countermeasures on Wednesday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that as the United States was “applying tariffs worth 28 billion dollars, we are responding with countermeasures worth 26 billion euros,” or about $28 billion. Those measures, which cover not just steel and aluminum products but also textiles, home appliances and agricultural goods, are due to take effect on April 1.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer responded by saying that the EU was punishing America instead of fixing what he viewed as excess capacity in steel and aluminum production.
“The EU’s punitive action completely disregards the national security imperatives of the United States – and indeed international security – and is yet another indicator that the EU’s trade and economic policies are out of step with reality,” he said in a statement.
Meeting on Wednesday with Ireland’s Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Trump said “of course” he wants to respond to EU’s retaliations and “of course” Ireland is taking advantage of the United States.
“The EU was set up in order to take advantage of the United States,” Trump said.
Last year, the United States ran a $87 billion trade imbalance with Ireland. That’s partially because of the tax structure created by Trump’s 2017 overhaul, which incentivized US pharmaceutical companies to record their sales abroad, Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, said on X.
Canada sees itself as locked in a trade war because of White House claims about fentanyl smuggling and that its natural resources and factories subtract from the US economy instead of supporting it.
“This is going to be a day to day fight. This is now the second round of unjustified tariffs leveled against Canada,” said Mélanie Joly, Canada’s foreign affairs minister. “The latest excuse is national security despite the fact that Canada’s steel and aluminum adds to America’s security. All the while there is a threat of further and broader tariffs on April 2 still looming. The excuse for those tariffs shifts every day.”
Canada is the largest foreign supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States and plans to impose retaliatory tariffs of Canadian $29.8 billion ($20.7 billion) starting Thursday in response to the US taxes on the metals.
Canada’s new tariffs would be on steel and aluminum products, as well as US goods including computers, sports equipment and water heaters worth $14.2 billion Canadian ($9.9 billion). That’s in addition to the 25 percent counter tariffs on $30 billion Canadian ($20.8 billion) of imports from the US that were put in place on March 4 in response to other Trump import taxes that he’s partially delayed by a month.
Trump told CEOs in the Business Roundtable a day earlier that the tariffs were causing companies to invest in US factories. The 7.5 percent drop in the S&P 500 stock index over the past month on fears of deteriorating growth appears unlikely to dissuade him, as Trump argued that higher tariff rates would be more effective at bringing back factories.
“The higher it goes, the more likely it is they’re going to build,” Trump told the group. “The biggest win is if they move into our country and produce jobs. That’s a bigger win than the tariffs themselves, but the tariffs are going to be throwing off a lot of money to this country.”
Trump on Tuesday had threatened to put tariffs of 50 percent on steel and aluminum from Canada, but he chose to stay with the 25 percent rate after the province of Ontario suspended plans to put a surcharge on electricity sold to Michigan, Minnesota and New York.
Democratic lawmakers dismissed Trump’s claims that his tariffs are about national security and drug smuggling, saying they’re actually about generating revenues to help cover the cost of his planned income tax cuts for the wealthy.
“Donald Trump knows his policies could wreck the economy, but he’s doing it anyway,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York. “Why are they doing all these crazy things that Americans don’t like? One reason, and one reason alone: tax breaks for billionaires, the north star of the Republican party’s goals.
In many ways, the president is addressing what he perceives as unfinished business from his first term. Trump meaningfully increased tariffs, but the revenues collected by the federal government were too small to significantly increase overall inflationary pressures.
Outside forecasts by the Budget Lab at Yale University, Tax Policy Center and others suggest that US families would have the costs of the taxes passed onto them in the form of higher prices.
With Wednesday’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, Trump is seeking to remedy his original 2018 import taxes that were eroded by exemptions.
After Canada and Mexico agreed to his demand for a revamped North American trade deal in 2020, they avoided the import taxes on the metals. Other US trading partners had import quotas supplant the tariffs. And the first Trump administration also allowed US companies to request exemptions from the tariffs if, for instance, they couldn’t find the steel they needed from domestic producers.
While Trump’s tariffs could help steel and aluminum plants in the United States, they could raise prices for the manufacturers that use the metals as raw materials.
Moreover, economists have found, the gains to the steel and aluminum industries were more than offset by the cost they imposed on “downstream’’ manufacturers that use their products.
At these downstream companies, production fell by nearly $3.5 billion because of the tariffs in 2021, a loss that exceeded the $2.3 billion uptick in production that year by aluminum producers and steelmakers, the US International Trade Commission found in 2023.
Trump sees the tariffs as leading to more domestic factories, and the White House has noted that Volvo, Volkswagen and Honda are all exploring an increase to their US footprint. But the prospect of higher prices, fewer sales and lower profits might cause some companies to refrain from investing in new facilities.
“If you’re an executive in the boardroom, are you really going to tell your board it’s the time to expand that assembly line?” said John Murphy, senior vice president at the US Chamber of Commerce.
The top steel exporters to the US are Canada, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea and Japan, with exports from Taiwan and Vietnam growing at a fast pace, according to the International Trade Administration. Imports from China, the world’s largest steel producer, account for only a small fraction of what the US buys.
The lion’s share of US aluminum imports comes from Canada.


UN launches reform initiative as it nears its 80th anniversary and faces funding cuts

UN launches reform initiative as it nears its 80th anniversary and faces funding cuts
Updated 29 min 30 sec ago
Follow

UN launches reform initiative as it nears its 80th anniversary and faces funding cuts

UN launches reform initiative as it nears its 80th anniversary and faces funding cuts
  • Initiative’s objective will be to present member states with proposals for improving the way the organization works, says secretary-general
  • UN’s resources have been shrinking in the past seven years because not all member states pay their yearly dues, and many don’t pay on time

UNITED NATIONS: The UN chief launched a new initiative Wednesday to reform the United Nations as it approaches its 80th anniversary, saying the 193-member global organization needs an urgent update to deal with major funding reductions and still tackle the world’s challenges.
Secretary-General António Guterres dismissed any relationship between his UN80 Initiative and cuts to foreign aid and other programs that US President Donald Trump and ally Elon Musk say will make the US government more efficient.
“We are talking about completely different processes, methodologies and objectives,” Guterres told reporters. “This is a continuation and an intensification of work that we have always been doing.”
He said the UN initiative’s objective will be to present member states with proposals for improving the way the organization works, reviewing the increasing number of mandates from the UN Security Council and General Assembly, and making structural changes to streamline operations.
Guterres and his predecessors in past decades have struggled to reform the United Nations, which was established following World War II, and bring it into a modern era with different powers, new technology and greater global divisions.
One key problem is that while the secretary-general is the UN’s chief executive, power rests with the 193 member nations that have very different ideas about the UN and the world.
The United Nations also has faced sharp criticism for its failure to preserve international peace and security — its key mission — with critics pointing to the wars in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and Congo, to name a few. The UN has been key to providing humanitarian aid to millions of people and for its work helping refugees and children.
Trump signed an executive order saying some UN agencies and bodies have drifted from their mission to promote peace and prevent future global conflicts and ordered a review of their operations.
“I’ve always felt that the UN has tremendous potential,” Trump has said. “It’s not living up to that potential right now. ... They’ve got to get their act together.”
Stressing that the United Nations reflects the world, Guterres said these are times of intense uncertainty and unpredictability.
He said the UN’s work is affected by multiplying conflicts, inadequate progress in reducing poverty, widespread flouting of international law, violations of human rights and the lack of guardrails for new technologies, including artificial intelligence — to name a few.
“And all of them are aggravated by major reductions of funding for humanitarian aid and development cooperation,” the secretary-general said. “In many cases, these obstacles are fueling dangerous levels of geopolitical tensions and divisions.”
Guterres didn’t name any countries, but the Trump administration has dismantled the US Agency for International Development, which was in charge of humanitarian aid, and cut 83 percent of USAID’s programs. Other countries, including the United Kingdom, also are reducing humanitarian aid.
He said the UN’s resources have been shrinking, pointing to its liquidity crisis for at least the past seven years because not all member states pay their yearly dues, and many don’t pay on time.
Guterres said the UN80 Initiative is not only about reforming the UN but about “better serving people whose very lives depend on us” and “taxpayers around the world who underwrite everything we do.”
The initiative will cover not only the UN Secretariat but all its funds and agencies and offices in Geneva, Nairobi and Vienna. It will be led by UN Undersecretary-General for Policy Guy Ryder, who will head a task force of top officials from the UN system, Guterres said.
The UN budget for 2025, which was adopted last December, is $3.72 billion. The US, with the world’s biggest economy, is expected to pay 22 percent. China, with the second-largest economy, just had its share raised to 20 percent.
Guterres said he hopes to move as soon as possible to take action in areas where he has authority and will urge member states “to consider the many decisions that rest with them.”


What is the Immigration Act of 1952 and why do Trump officials keep talking about it?

What is the Immigration Act of 1952 and why do Trump officials keep talking about it?
Updated 32 min 46 sec ago
Follow

What is the Immigration Act of 1952 and why do Trump officials keep talking about it?

What is the Immigration Act of 1952 and why do Trump officials keep talking about it?
  • The act comes up so frequently because it is the legal foundation of modern immigration law, encompassing a vast range of regulations and procedures

Again and again the Trump White House has turned to a 73-year-old legal statute to defend its immigration crackdown.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt cited the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 on Tuesday to explain the arrest and planned deportation of a Palestinian activist and legal US resident with a green card.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem cited it in late February when announcing that anyone living in the US illegally would have to register with the federal government.
The act has been mentioned in presidential orders, press releases and speeches.
But what is it?
Why do officials keep talking about the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952?
The act comes up so frequently because it is the legal foundation of modern immigration law, encompassing a vast range of regulations and procedures. It has been amended hundreds of times since it was passed, during the Truman administration.
Decades of sweeping changes in immigration law link back to the act.
“These were all massive public laws in their own standing, but they were all amending” the 1952 legislation, said Niels Frenzen, an immigration expert at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law.
The law, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act, came amid the anti-communist fears of the early Cold War. While it eased some race-based immigration restrictions, particularly for Asians, it effectively limited most immigration to Europeans. It also codified rules allowing ideology to be used to deny immigration and allow deportation.
How has the Trump administration used the act and its many provisions?
Most recently, the Trump White House used the act as the basis to arrest Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist who helped organize campus protests at Columbia University against the Israel-Hamas war. Khalil, a Palestinian who was born and raised in Syria, became a legal permanent resident, also known as a green card holder, last year. He is married to an American citizen.
But the administration says he still can be expelled.
“Under the Immigration and Nationality Act the secretary of state has the right to revoke a green card or a visa for individuals who are adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests” of the US, Leavitt told reporters Tuesday.
The reality is more complicated, legal scholars say. The provision the White House is using – Section 237 (a)(4)(C) — is rarely invoked, requires extensive judicial review and is intended for unusual cases when someone’s presence in the US could cause diplomatic turmoil.
“The deportation has to have some seriousness to it,” said Richard Boswell, a University of California San Francisco law professor whose work often focuses on immigration. “The burden is on the government” to show the person should be deported.
Scholars often point back to the Clinton administration for a recent, high-profile example.
Mario Ruiz Massieu was a former deputy attorney general in Mexico when he was arrested in 1995 for trying to leave the US with $26,000 in undeclared cash. Then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher said that not deporting Ruiz-Massieu “would jeopardize our ability to work with Mexico on law enforcement matters.”
When else has the act been invoked?
- Under Section 212(f) , the president may block entry of “any aliens or class of aliens into the United States” whose presence would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” Donald Trump used that broad language to impose a travel ban on people from several Muslim-majority countries during his first term and, on the first day of his second term, laid groundwork for a renewed travel ban. His advisers are expected to make recommendations later this month.
- In late February, Noem said in a statement she would “fully enforce the Immigration and Nationality Act,” and would require anyone living in the US illegally to register with the federal government, with those who don’t facing fines, imprisonment or both.
- Joe Biden used the act’s humanitarian parole provision more than any president to allow temporarily allow people into the US from countries including Ukraine, Afghanistan, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Specifically, it allows the president to admit anyone “on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.” The Trump administration is facing a lawsuit for ending the long-standing legal tool.


‘Stranded’ astronauts closer to coming home after next ISS launch

‘Stranded’ astronauts closer to coming home after next ISS launch
Updated 41 min ago
Follow

‘Stranded’ astronauts closer to coming home after next ISS launch

‘Stranded’ astronauts closer to coming home after next ISS launch
  • “All systems are looking good and weather is a go,” SpaceX wrote Wednesday on X

WASHINGTON: A routine crew rotation at the International Space Station has taken on unusual significance: It paves the way for a pair of astronauts stranded for more than nine months to finally come home.
The NASA-SpaceX Crew-10 mission is set to launch from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on Wednesday at 7:48 p.m. (2348 GMT), bound for the ISS.
“All systems are looking good and weather is a go,” SpaceX wrote Wednesday on X, as the team of two US astronauts, one Japanese astronaut and a Russian cosmonaut said their goodbyes to relatives and drove to the launch pad.
All eyes however will be on Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, the NASA duo who have been stuck aboard the ISS since June after their Boeing Starliner spacecraft developed propulsion issues and was deemed unfit for their return.
Wilmore and Williams were initially slated for an eight-day mission but were reassigned to Crew-9 after its astronauts arrived in September aboard a SpaceX Dragon. The spacecraft carried only two crew members instead of the usual four to make room for Wilmore and Williams.
Crew-9 can only return to Earth after Crew-10 arrives.
“We came up prepared to stay long, even though we plan to stay short,” Wilmore said in a recent news conference. “That’s what your nation’s human space flight program is all about, planning for unknown, unexpected contingencies.”
Crew-10 is expected to dock early Thursday, followed by a brief handover before Crew-9 departs on March 16 for an ocean splashdown off the Florida coast, weather permitting.
Along with Wilmore and Williams, NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov will also be aboard the returning Dragon capsule.
Space remains an area of cooperation between the United States and Russia despite the Ukraine conflict, with cosmonauts traveling to the ISS aboard SpaceX Crew Dragons and astronauts doing the same via Soyuz capsules launched from Kazakhstan.

Wilmore and Williams’s prolonged stay has recently become a political flashpoint, as President Donald Trump and his close adviser Elon Musk have accused ex-president Joe Biden’s administration of abandoning the pair.
SpaceX boss Musk has suggested, without providing specifics, that he had offered Biden a “rescue” mission outside of the routine crew rotations.
However, with Trump now in office for nearly two months, the astronauts are still set to return as originally planned.
The issue recently sparked a heated online exchange between Musk and Danish astronaut Andreas Mogensen, whom Musk called a slur for mentally disabled people. Several retired astronauts quickly came to Mogensen’s defense.
One astronaut who backed Musk however was Wilmore, who offered contradictory statements in last week’s press conference.
“I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says is absolutely factual,” he said, seemingly endorsing the SpaceX founder’s version of events, before adding “politics is not playing into this at all.”
The Crew-10 team consists of NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan’s Takuya Onishi, and Russia’s Kirill Peskov.
McClain, the mission’s commander, will be making her second trip to space.
“I’m looking forward to breaking bread with those guys, talking to them, giving them big hugs,” she said of Wilmore and Williams.
During their mission, the new crew will conduct a range of scientific experiments, including flammability tests for future spacecraft designs and research into the effects of space on the human body.


Defiant Caribbean leaders dismiss trafficking accusations as US targets Cuba’s doctor diplomacy

Defiant Caribbean leaders dismiss trafficking accusations as US targets Cuba’s doctor diplomacy
Updated 13 March 2025
Follow

Defiant Caribbean leaders dismiss trafficking accusations as US targets Cuba’s doctor diplomacy

Defiant Caribbean leaders dismiss trafficking accusations as US targets Cuba’s doctor diplomacy
  • Trinidad and Tobago PM Keith Rowley: ‘Out of the blue now, we have been called human traffickers because we hire technical people who we pay top dollar’
  • Jamaican FM Kamina Johnson Smith: ‘Their (Cuban medics) presence here is of importance to our health care system’

Caribbean leaders this week rejected US accusations of Cuban labor exploitation after the United States announced it will restrict the visas of officials tied to a Cuban government program that sends medics abroad.
The US announced the measure late last month, arguing that the labor export programs run by Cuba’s government, which include many medics, “enrich the Cuban regime.” It further argued that those involved are complicit in the “exploitation and forced labor of Cuban workers.”
Cuba’s leaders, however, reject the US stance as Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s “personal agenda... based on falsehoods” and said the measure could affect millions of health care beneficiaries.
Rubio is the son of Cuban immigrants who fled the island to Florida, where President Donald Trump’s top diplomat would later win a Senate seat.
Since Cuba’s 1959 revolution, its medics have been dispatched to countries around the world, treating diseases that wreak havoc on poor countries, from cholera in Haiti to Ebola in West Africa. The program is also a key source of hard cash as the island nation endures its latest deep economic crisis.
Cuba says a decades-long US embargo, opposed by the vast majority of the United Nations, is the key driver of the crisis.
“Out of the blue now, we have been called human traffickers because we hire technical people who we pay top dollar,” said Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Keith Rowley at a hospital event.
Rowley added that he was prepared to lose his US visa.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves noted at least 60 people in the small island nation are on a Cuban-run haemodialysis program used to treat kidney failure.
“If the Cubans are not there, we may not be able to run the service,” he said, adding Cuban personnel are paid the same as locals. “I will prefer to lose my visa than to have 60 poor and working people die.”
Last week, Jamaican Foreign Minister Kamina Johnson Smith told reporters that her government views Cuban medics as important.
“Their presence here is of importance to our health care system,” she said, pointing to 400 doctors, nurses and medical technicians currently working in the country.
In a social media post, Bahamian Foreign Minister Fred Mitchell also vouched for the program, saying his government “follows all international best practices in the recruitment of labor.”